A heart transplant center experience with basiliximab induction strategies: A double edged sword?

BACKGROUND: The use of induction immunosuppression for heart transplantation (HT) is debated given the uncertain benefit and potential risks of infection and malignancy. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 475 consecutive HT recipients from 2003 to 2020 grouped by use of induction with basiliximab group (BG) and the no basiliximab group (NBG). Subgroup analysis by era compared pre-2016 standard-basiliximab (BX) induction and 2016-2020 with selective-BX use as part of a calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimen. RESULTS: When adjusted for confounders (sex, age, PRA, eGFR), the BG was less likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) (OR.42, p < .001), but had more antibody mediated rejection (AMR) (OR 11.7, p < .001) and more cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (OR 3.8, p = .04). There was no difference between BG and NBG in the incidence of malignancies or infections. When stratified by era (pre-2016 vs. 2016-2020), ACR remained less common in the BG than the NBG (36% vs. 50%, p = .045) groups, while AMR remained more common (9.7 vs. 0% p = .005). There was no significant difference in conditional survival comparing pre-and post-2016 NBG (HR 2.20 (95% CI.75-6.43); however, both pre-2016 BG and post-2016 BG have significantly higher mortality (HR 2.37 [95% CI 1.02-5.50) and HR 2.69 (95% CI 1.08-6.71), p = .045 and.03, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Basiliximab reduces the incidence of ACR but increases the risk of AMR, CAV, and may be associated with increased mortality. Mechanistic studies are needed to describe a potential T-cell-escape mechanism with enhanced humoral immunity.

Effect of steroid pulses in severe BK virus allograft nephropathy with extensive interstitial inflammation.

INTRODUCTION: As there is no specific antiviral treatment currently available for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (BKVAN), its management relies on immunosuppression reduction in kidney transplant patients. Data on efficacy of steroid pulses in this indication are lacking. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocenter study on 64 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven BKVAN. Patients within the "pulse group" (n = 37) received IV methylprednisolone 10 mg/kg 3 days consecutively. In the "low dose" steroid group (n = 27), patients were continued oral prednisone 5 mg daily. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 78 months in the steroid pulse group and 56 months in the low dose group (p = 0.15). Mean eGFR values at diagnosis were comparable, as well as other demographic characteristics. Mean BK plasma viral load was higher in "pulse" than in "low dose" steroid group. Pulse group had higher inflammation and tubulitis (p < 0.05). Graft loss reached 57% in the "pulse" group versus 41% in the "low dose" group, p = 0.20. Rejection events were similar. No major adverse event was statistically associated with steroid pulse, including infections, cancer, and de novo diabetes. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in the evolution of both groups of patients, despite patients receiving "pulse" steroids were identified as the most severe sharing higher BK viral load and more frequent active lesions on histology.

The role of anticomplement therapy in the management of the kidney allograft.

As the number of patients living with kidney failure grows, the need also grows for kidney transplantation, the gold standard kidney replacement therapy that provides a survival advantage. This may result in an increased rate of transplantation from HLA-mismatched donors that increases the rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which already is the leading cause of allograft failure. Plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, anti-CD20 therapies (i.e., rituximab), bortezomib and splenectomy have been used over the years to treat AMR as well as to prevent AMR in high-risk sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Eculizumab and ravulizumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the C5 protein of the complement pathway and part of the expanding field of anticomplement therapies, which is not limited to kidney transplant recipients, and also includes complement-mediated microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and ANCA-vasculitis. In this narrative review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the pathophysiological background and use of anti-C5 strategies (eculizumab and ravulizumab) and C1-esterase inhibitor in AMR, either to prevent AMR in high-risk desensitized patients or to treat AMR as first-line or rescue therapy and also to treat de novo thrombotic microangiopathy in kidney transplant recipients.

Long-Term Outcomes with Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Real-World Data Analysis.

BACKGROUND Long-term real-world outcomes data for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) converting from immediate-release tacrolimus (IRT) to prolonged-release tacrolimus (PRT) are limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective, non-interventional review of adult KTRs treated with PRT for ≥1 month was conducted in Germany. Data were extracted from time of transplant (2008-2014) to 2018. Primary composite endpoints (graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft dysfunction) and secondary endpoints (all-cause mortality, kidney function course, and tacrolimus dose/trough levels) were analyzed for sub-cohorts: de novo PRT, early conversion from IRT (within 6 months post-transplant), and late conversion (7 months to 3 years). RESULTS Analysis included 163 patients (101 de novo, 12 early converters, and 50 late converters). The overall Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from efficacy failure through 5 years was 0.537, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.455-0.612) (de novo: 0.512 [0.407-0.608]; early converters: 0.500 [0.208-0.736]; late converters: 0.594 [0.443-0.717]). The overall survival rate was 0.925 (95% CI 0.872-0.957) (de novo: 0.900 [0.823-0.945]; early converters: 0.917 [0.539-0.988]; late converters: 0.977 [0.846-0.997]). During follow-up, there was a gradual reduction in tacrolimus dose and trough levels; kidney function remained stable in all cohorts. Multivariable analysis found re-transplantation, organ donor quality, best estimated glomerular filtration rate 8-12 weeks after transplant, and treatment center (between-center differences in age, sex, donor status/quality) were significantly associated with efficacy failure. CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in long-term survival profiles between KTRs who received PRT de novo vs those who converted from IRT, with 5-year survival remaining high in both groups.

Utility of a fusion protein T-cell co-stimulation blocker Belatacept in heart transplant recipients: Real world experience from a high volume center.

BACKGROUND: Belatacept (BTC), a fusion protein, selectively inhibits T-cell co-stimulation by binding to the CD80 and CD86 receptors on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and has been used as immunosuppression in adult renal transplant recipients. However, data regarding its use in heart transplant (HT) recipients are limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to delineate BTC's application in HT, focusing on efficacy, safety, and associated complications at a high-volume HT center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent HT between January 2017 and December 2021 and subsequently received BTC as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. Twenty-one HT recipients were identified. Baseline characteristics, history of rejection, and indication for BTC use were collected. Outcomes included renal function, graft function, allograft rejection and mortality. Follow-up data were collected through December 2023. RESULTS: Among 776 patients monitored from January 2017 to December 2021 21 (2.7%) received BTC treatment. Average age at transplantation was 53 years (± 12 years), and 38% were women. BTC administration began, on average, 689 [483, 1830] days post-HT. The primary indications for BTC were elevated pre-formed donor-specific antibodies in highly sensitized patients (66.6%) and renal sparing (23.8%), in conjunction with reduced calcineurin inhibitor dosage. Only one (4.8%) patient encountered rejection within a year of starting BTC. Graft function by echocardiography remained stable at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. An improvement was observed in serum creatinine levels (76.2% of patients), decreasing from a median of 1.58 to 1.45 (IQR [1.0-2.1] to [1.1-1.9]) over 12 months (p = .054). eGFR improved at 3 and 6 months compared with 3 months pre- BTC levels; however, this was not statistically significant (p = .24). Treatment discontinuation occurred in seven patients (33.3%) of whom four (19%) were switched back to full dose CNI. Infections occurred in 11 patients (52.4%), leading to BTC discontinuation in 4 patients (19%). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, BTC therapy was used as alternative immunosuppression for management of highly sensitized patients or for renal sparing. BTC therapy when combined with CNI dose reduction resulted in stabilization in renal function as measured through renal surrogate markers, which did not, however, reach statistical significance. Patients on BTC maintained a low rejection rate and preserved graft function. Infections were common during BTC therapy and were associated with medication pause/discontinuation in 19% of patients. Further randomized studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of BTC in HT recipients.

Pharmacotherapy in the heart transplant recipient: A primer for nurse clinicians and pharmacists.

Heart transplantation (HT) is the definitive treatment for eligible patients with end-stage heart disease. A major complication of HT is allograft rejection which can lead to graft dysfunction and death. The guiding principle of chronic immunosuppression therapy is to prevent rejection of the transplanted organ while avoiding oversuppression of the immune system, which can cause opportunistic infections and malignancy. The purpose of this review is to describe immunosuppressive management of the HT recipient-including agent-specific pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, outcomes data, adverse effects, clinical considerations, and recent guideline updates. We will also provide recommendations for medical prophylaxis of immunosuppressed patients based on the most recent clinical guidelines. Additionally, we highlight the importance of medical therapy adherence and the effect of social determinants of health on the long-term management of HT. HT recipients are a complex and high-risk population. The objective of this review is to describe basic pharmacotherapy in HT and implications for nurses and pharmacists.

Treatment of a MyD88 inhibitor alleviates rejection and inflammation in xenotransplantation by inhibiting dendritic cells activation and trained immunity in macrophages.

BACKGROUND: Acute vascular rejection (AVR) and systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients (SIXR) negatively impact the xenografts survival, and novel immunosuppressants are required to improve survival outcomes. We previously reported that TJ-M2010-5, a myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) inhibitor, exerts excellent anti-rejection effects in allogeneic transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of TJ-M2010-5 in preventing AVR and SIXR and to investigate whether combined treatment of TJ-M2010-5 with anti-CD154 antibody (MR1) could prolong xenograft survival furthermore. METHODS: A model involving heart transplantation from Sprague-Dawley rats to BALB/c mice was established in vivo, and the xenografts developed typical AVR. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells and macrophages were cultured to study the underlying mechanisms induced by rat cardiomyocyte lysate stimulation in vitro. RESULTS: TJ-M2010-5 monotherapy prolonged xenograft survival, although combination treatment with MR1 further enhanced the anti-AVR and anti-SIXR effects with about 21 days graft survival, compared to monotherapy. TJ-M2010-5 reduced dendritic cell and macrophage activation induced by xenotransplantation, downregulated CD80/CD86 expression, suppressed B-cell activation and anti-donor antibody generation, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and tissue factor expression, and attenuated epigenetic modifications underlying interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α production in macrophages by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B nuclear translocation. CONCLUSIONS: TJ-M2010-5 attenuated AVR and SIXR and contributed to xenograft survival by inhibiting dendritic cell and macrophage activation. A dual-system inhibition strategy combining TJ-M2010-5 with anti-CD154 antibody achieved better results in xenotransplantation.

Three-year outcomes of de novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in heart transplant (HT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus. We compared long-term efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients. METHODS: 25 prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 3 years following transplant was compared between groups using non-inferiority analysis. RESULTS: LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 16% (90%CI, -37%, -1%, non-inferiority p = 0.002) up to 3 years following heart transplant. Up to 3-years post-transplant, 14 patients remained on once-daily LCPT and 10 patients were switched to IR-tacrolimus due to lack of insurance coverage. There were no significant differences in the rate of chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, cytomegalovirus requiring treatment, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and malignancy within 3 years following transplant. CONCLUSION: LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus in heart transplantation with a similar safety profile. Narrowly-constrained FDA labels specific to kidney transplant remain a barrier to consistent access to many immunosuppressant medications for recipients of non-kidney solid organs. We recommend the FDA consider developing facile pathways for expanding the approved label of extended-release tacrolimus formulations to heart transplant recipients.

Translating B cell immunology to the treatment of antibody-mediated allograft rejection.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), including chronic AMR (cAMR), causes ~50% of kidney allograft losses each year. Despite attempts to develop well-tolerated and effective therapeutics for the management of AMR, to date, none has obtained FDA approval, thereby highlighting an urgent unmet medical need. Discoveries over the past decade from basic, translational and clinical studies of transplant recipients have provided a foundation for developing novel therapeutic approaches to preventing and treating AMR and cAMR. These interventions are aimed at reducing donor-specific antibody levels, decreasing graft injury and fibrosis, and preserving kidney function. Innovative approaches emerging from basic science findings include targeting interactions between alloreactive T cells and B cells, and depleting alloreactive memory B cells, as well as donor-specific antibody-producing plasmablasts and plasma cells. Therapies aimed at reducing the cytotoxic antibody effector functions mediated by natural killer cells and the complement system, and their associated pro-inflammatory cytokines, are also undergoing evaluation. The complexity of the pathogenesis of AMR and cAMR suggest that multiple approaches will probably be required to treat these disease processes effectively. Definitive answers await results from large, double-blind, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trials.

Immunosuppressive enzyme-responsive nanoparticles for enhanced accumulation in liver allograft to overcome acute rejection.

Acute rejection is a life-threatening complication after liver transplantation. Immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus are used to inhibit acute rejection of liver grafts in clinic. However, inefficient intragraft accumulation may reduce the therapeutic outcomes of tacrolimus. Here, an enzyme-responsive nanoparticle is developed to selectively enhance the accumulation of tacrolimus in liver allograft through enzyme-induced aggregation to refine immunotherapeutic efficacy of tacrolimus. The nanoparticles are composed of amphiphilic tacrolimus prodrugs synthesized by covalently conjugating tacrolimus and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9)-cleavable peptide-containing methoxy poly (ethylene glycol) to poly (l-glutamic acid). Upon exposure to MMP9, which is overexpressed in rejected liver allografts, the nanoparticles undergo a morphological transition from spherical micellar nanoparticles to microscale aggregate-like scaffolds. Intravenous administration of MMP9-responsive nanoparticles into a rat model of acute liver graft rejection results in enhanced nanoparticle accumulation in allograft as compared to nonresponsive nanoparticles. Consequently, the MMP9-responsive nanoparticles significantly inhibit intragraft inflammatory cell infiltration and proliferation, maintain intragraft immunosuppressive environment, alleviate graft damage, improve liver allograft function, abate weight loss and prolong recipient survival. This work proves that morphology-switchable enzyme-responsive nanoparticles represent an innovative strategy for selectively enhancing intragraft accumulation of immunosuppressive agents to improve treatment of liver allograft rejection.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to belatacept-based immunosuppressive therapy skews terminal proliferation of non-classical monocytes and lowers lymphocyte counts.

Belatacept, a modified form of CTLA-Ig that blocks CD28-mediated co-stimulation of T cells, is an immune-suppressant that can be used as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). In kidney transplant recipients, belatacept has been associated with improved renal function and reduced cardiovascular toxicity. Monocytes as well as T-lymphocytes play causal roles in the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic disease. We hypothesized that the beneficial impact of the use of belatacept over CNIs on cardiovascular risk could be partly explained by the impact of belatacept therapy on these circulating leukocytes. Hence, we phenotyped circulating leukocytes in transplanted patients with a stable renal function that were randomized between either continuation of CNI or conversion to belatacept in two international studies in which we participated. In 41 patients, we found that belatacept-treated patients consistently showed lower numbers of B-lymphocytes, T-lymphocytes as well as CD14-negative monocytes (CD14NM), especially in non-diabetic patients. Our observation that this decrease was associated to plasma concentrations of TNFα is consistent with a model where CD14NM-production of TNFα is diminished by belatacept-treatment, due to effects on the antigen-presenting cell compartment.

Does bortezomib influence pre-transplant desensitization therapy or benefit post-heart transplant outcomes for highly sensitized patients?

BACKGROUND: The use of bortezomib which is a proteasome inhibitor has been demonstrated to be efficacious in small number of patients as a desensitization strategy in heart transplant. We reviewed our single center's experience using Bortezomib along with plasmapheresis as desensitization therapy for highly sensitized patients to assess pre- and post-transplant outcomes. METHOD: We assessed 43 highly sensitized patients awaiting HTx (defined as cPRA > 50%) between 2010 and 2021 who underwent desensitization therapy with bortezomib. Only those patients who subsequently underwent HTx were included in this study. Enrolled patients received up to four doses of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 ) over 2 weeks in conjunction with plasmapheresis. The efficacy of PP/BTZ was assessed by comparing the calculated panel reactive antibodies to HLA class I or class II antigens. Post-transplant outcomes including overall survival and incidence of rejection were compared to those of non-sensitized patients (PRA < 10%, n = 649) from the same center. RESULTS: The average cPRA prior to PP/BTZ was 94.5%. Post-PP/BTZ there was no statistically significant decline in mean cPRA, class I cPRA, or class II cPRA, though the average percentage decrease in class I cPRA (8.7 ± 17.0%) was higher than the change in class II cPRA (4.4 ± 13.3%). Resulted were also replicated with C1q-binding antibodies showing more effect on I class compared to class II (15.0 ± 37.4% vs. 6.8 ± 33.6%) as well as with 1:8 dilutional assay (14.0 ± 23.0% vs. 9.1 ± 34.9%). Additionally, PP/BTZ treated patients and the control group of non-sensitized patients had similar overall 1 year survival (95.4 vs. 92.5%) but patients with PP/BTZ had increased incidence of AMR (79.1% vs. 97.1%, p = < .001), any treated rejection (62.8% vs. 86.7%, p = < .001) and de novo DSA development (81.4% vs. 92.5%, p = .007). Major side effects of PP/BTZ included thrombocytopenia (42%), infection requiring antibiotics (28%), and neuropathy (12%). CONCLUSION: The use of bortezomib in highly sensitized patients does not significantly lower circulating antibodies prior to heart transplantation. However, its use may improve the chances of obtaining an immuno-compatible donor heart and contribute to acceptable post-transplant outcomes.

Immunosuppression in solid organ-transplant recipients and impact on nutrition support.

A key component to nutrition support is to consider immunosuppressive agents, the interaction with nutrients, and how the side effects of the medications influence nutrition support. The immunosuppression of the solid organ-transplant recipient involves the individualized titration of multiple therapeutic agents to prevent allorecognition and, thus, rejection of the transplanted organ. Induction immunosuppression includes the agents used at the time of transplant to prevent early rejection. Maintenance immunosuppression typically consists of oral medications taken for life. Regular therapeutic monitoring of immunosuppression is necessary to balance the risk of rejection with that of infections and malignancy. In the acute-care setting, multidisciplinary collaboration, including pharmacy and nutrition, is needed to optimize the route of administration, titration, and side effects of immunosuppression. Long-term nutrition management after transplant is also vital to prevent exacerbating adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapies, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and bone loss. This review summarizes common immunosuppressive agents currently utilized in solid organ-transplant recipients and factors that may influence decisions on nutrition support.

Drug levels after sirolimus initiation and short-term outcomes in ambulatory heart transplantation recipients.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the effect of relative changes in combined tacrolimus and sirolimus (drug) levels, following sirolimus initiation, on outcomes in ambulatory heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of HTx recipients who received tacrolimus, followed by sirolimus initiation, any time after HTx. We calculated the relative change in combined drug levels 1-month post-sirolimus initiation, relative to tacrolimus levels pre-initiation, and categorized patients into decreased (≥15% decrease), stable (<15% decrease to <15% increase), or increased (≥15% increase) groups. We compared, across the three groups, changes in post-initiation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using one-way ANOVA and Sidák's post-hoc analysis, as well as the individual and composite outcomes of new donor specific antibodies (DSA), acute cellular rejection (ACR), and all-cause mortality using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Amongst 99 HTx recipients included, the median age was 53 years, time to sirolimus initiation was 1.5 years post-HTx, and pre-sirolimus eGFR was 52 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Nine patients had decreased, 15 stable, and 75 increased, relative combined drug levels. Relative change in eGFR was significantly higher in patients with decreased levels compared to patients with increased levels at 6 months post-initiation (P < .05), but this was not sustained at 12 months. There were no differences in LVEF change or in individual and composite risks for developing DSA, ACR, and all-cause mortality at 12 months across the groups. CONCLUSION: Post-sirolimus initiation, a relative decrease in combined drug levels, compared to increased levels, was associated with temporarily improved renal function.

Feasibility of steroid-free tacrolimus-basiliximab immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation and predictors for steroid requirement.

Avoidance of steroids in pediatric liver transplantation may reduce toxicity and morbidity. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of a steroid-free tacrolimus-basiliximab immunosuppression scheme, the risk factors associated with steroid requirement, and safety parameters. Patients who underwent liver transplantation for biliary atresia between 2011 and 2019 were included and followed for 6 months after transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus-based treatment with basiliximab induction. Steroid-free survival was estimated, and risk factors for steroid requirement were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis. A total of 76 patients were included, of whom 42 (55.3%) required steroids (>14 d) due to biopsy-proven acute rejection (47.6%, n = 20), instability in liver function tests (35.7%, n = 15), tacrolimus-related adverse drug reactions (14.3%, n = 6), or other reasons (bronchospasm episode, n = 1). Steroid-free survival was 45.9% (95% CI, 35.9-58.8). Independent factors associated with steroid requirement included tortuosity in tacrolimus trough levels (≥1.76 vs. <1.76: HR 5.8, 95% CI, 2.6-12.7; p < 0.001) and mean tacrolimus trough levels (≥ 6.4 ng/mL vs. < 6.4 ng/mL: HR 0.4, 95% CI, 0.2-0.7; p = 0.002). The rate of bacterial and viral infections was comparable between patients with and without steroids, although in the former group, cytomegalovirus infection developed earlier ( p = 0.03). Patients receiving steroids had higher total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL levels ( p < 0.05) during follow-up, but no changes in the height Z-score were observed 1 year after transplantation. Basiliximab induction in combination with tacrolimus-based treatment avoided steroid requirements in 45% of the patients. Tacrolimus variability and trough levels below 6.4 ng/mL independently increased the risk of steroid requirement. Further efforts should be focused on personalizing immunosuppressive treatment.

Cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis - a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is controversy regarding the optimal calcineurin inhibitor type after liver transplant(ation) (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We compared tacrolimus with cyclosporine in a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis based on registries representing nearly all LTs in Europe and the US. METHODS: From the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), we included adult patients with PSC undergoing a primary LT between 2000-2020. Patients initially treated with cyclosporine were propensity score-matched 1:3 with those initially treated with tacrolimus. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival rates. RESULTS: The propensity score-matched sample comprised 399 cyclosporine-treated and 1,197 tacrolimus-treated patients with PSC. During a median follow-up of 7.4 years (IQR 2.3-12.8, 12,579.2 person-years), there were 480 deaths and 231 re-LTs. The initial tacrolimus treatment was superior to cyclosporine in terms of patient and graft survival, with 10-year patient survival estimates of 72.8% for tacrolimus and 65.2% for cyclosporine (p <0.001) and 10-year graft survival estimates of 62.4% and 53.8% (p <0.001), respectively. These findings were consistent in the subgroups according to age, sex, registry (ELTR vs. SRTR), time period of LT, MELD score, and diabetes status. The acute rejection rates were similar between groups. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, tacrolimus (hazard ratio 0.72, p <0.001) and mycophenolate use (hazard ratio 0.82, p = 0.03) were associated with a reduced risk of graft loss or death, whereas steroid use was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is associated with better patient and graft survival rates than cyclosporine and should be the standard calcineurin inhibitor used after LT for patients with PSC. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The optimal calcineurin inhibitor to use after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis has yet to be firmly established. Since randomized trials with long follow-up are unlikely to be performed, multicontinental long-term registry data are essential in informing clinical practices. Our study supports the practice of using tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine in the initial immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The retrospective registry-based design is a limitation.

Extended-release tacrolimus dosing and outcomes in pediatric and young adult transplant recipients - A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Published data on LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) in the pediatric population are limited. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study describes LCPT doses needed to reach therapeutic ranges in pediatric and young adult kidney and liver transplant recipients in both de novo usage and conversion from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). Adverse outcomes up to 12 months after LCPT initiation were also evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-one transplant recipients (30 kidney, 11 liver) were included. The median initial doses of LCPT were 0.034 mg/kg (IQR 0.019) de novo and 0.09 mg/kg (IQR = 0.076) converted. The median doses at first therapeutic level were 0.086 mg/kg (IQR 0.028) de novo and 0.1 mg/kg (IQR 0.066) converted. The median LCPT:IR-Tac conversion ratio initially was 0.7 and 0.75 at therapeutic levels. The rate of AKI per 100 days of exposure to IR-Tac was 0.546 and 0.439 on LCPT. The percentage of patients with rejection was not different before and after conversion (clinical rejection 8.6% [n = 3] vs 11.4% [n = 4], p = .6; biopsy-proven rejection 2.9% [n = 1] vs 11.4% [n = 4], p = .11). One patient had graft loss unrelated to rejection, and the graft was explanted. CONCLUSION: In this study, pediatric and young adult abdominal transplant recipients had therapeutic tacrolimus levels at LCPT doses below the adult-labeled dose; the conversion ratio from IR-Tac to LCPT at therapeutic level was similar. There were no identified safety concerns in de novo or converted LCPT use in pediatric and young adult patients.

Evolution of HLA-sensitization according to immunosuppressive therapy management among kidney transplant patients returning to dialysis between 2008 and 2019: A French retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of immunosuppressive therapy (IT) after kidney allograft failure (KAF) remains controversial. Although maintaining IT may reduce HLA-sensitization and improve access to retransplantation, it may also increase the rate of immunosuppression-related complications. The overall impact on patient mortality is unknown. The main objective of this study was to compare the evolution of HLA-sensitization 6 months after KAF according to IT management. METHODS: Individual clinical and health care data were extracted from the French national end-stage kidney disease registry (Renal Epidemiology and Information Network [REIN]) and the French National Health Data system (SNDS), respectively. Patients aged > 18 years returning to dialysis after KAF between January 2008 and December 2019 in Lorraine were included. Patients were classified into two groups, IT continuation or IT discontinuation. HLA-sensitization was defined as an increase in incompatible graft rate (IGR) between KAF and 6 months post-KAF (change to a higher predefined category (0%-5%), (5%-20%), (20%-50%), (50%-85%), (85%-95%), (95%-98%), (98%-100%)). Secondary outcome was patient survival according to IT management. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included, 35 (29%) of whom continued IT. HLA-sensitization after KAF tended to be higher in the "IT discontinuation" group (57% vs. 38% in the "IT continuation" group, p = .07). In multivariate analysis, IT continuation was associated with a lower increase in IGR (OR .37, 95% CI [.14; .93]). IT management was not associated with patient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Continuation of IT after KAF was associated with less change in IGR and was not associated with excess mortality.

Survival of Heart Transplant Patients with Chagas' Disease Under Different Antiproliferative Immunosuppressive Regimens. / Sobrevida de Pacientes Transplantados Cardíacos com Doença de Chagas Sob Diferentes Regimes de Imunossupressores Antiproliferativos.

Chagas' disease (CD) is an important cause of heart transplantation (HT). The main obstacle is Chagas' disease reactivation (CDR), usually associated to high doses of immunosuppressants. Previous studies have suggested an association of mycophenolate mofetil with increased CDR. However, mortality predictors are unknown. To identify mortality risk factors in heart transplant patients with CD and the impact of antiproliferative regimen on survival. Retrospective study with CD patients who underwent HT between January 2004 and September 2020, under immunosuppression protocol that prioritized azathioprine and change to mycophenolate mofetil in case of rejection. We performed univariate regression to identify mortality predictors; and compared survival, rejection and evidence of CDR between who received azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and those who changed from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil after discharge ("Change" group). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Eighty-five patients were included, 54.1% men, median age 49 (39-57) years, and 91.8% were given priority in waiting list. Nineteen (22.4%) used azathioprine, 37 (43.5%) mycophenolate mofetil and 29 (34.1%) switched therapy; survival was not different between groups, 2.9 (1.6-5.0) x 2.9 (1.8-4.8) x 4.2 (2.0-5.0) years, respectively; p=0.4. There was no difference in rejection (42%, 73% and 59% respectively; p=0.08) or in CDR (T. cruzi positive by endomyocardial biopsy 5% x 11% x 7%; p=0.7; benznidazole use 58% x 65% x 69%; p=0.8; positive PCR for T. cruzi 20% x 68% x 42% respectively; p=0.1) rates. This retrospective study did not show difference in survival in heart transplant patients with CD receiving different antiproliferative regimens. Mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with statistically higher rates of CDR or graft rejection in this cohort. New randomized clinical trials are necessary to address this issue.

A Doença de Chagas (DC) é uma causa importante de transplante cardíaco (TC). O principal obstáculo é a reativação da DC (RDC), normalmente associada a altas doses de imunossupressores. Estudos anteriores sugeriram uma associação do micofenolato de mofetila com aumento na RDC. No entanto, preditores de mortalidade são desconhecidos. Identificar os fatores de risco de mortalidade em pacientes com DC após o TC e o impacto do regime antiproliferativo sobre a sobrevida. Estudo retrospectivo com pacientes chagásicos submetidos ao TC entre janeiro de 2004 e setembro de 2020, em protocolo de imunossupressão que priorizava o uso de azatioprina e sua mudança para micofenolato de mofetila em caso de rejeição. Realizamos regressão univariada para identificar preditores de mortalidade e comparamos sobrevida, rejeição, e evidência RDC entre os pacientes que usavam azatioprina, micofenolato de mofetila, e aqueles que mudaram de azatioprina para micofenolato (grupo "Mudança") após a alta. Um valor de p<0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Foram incluídos 85 pacientes, 54,1% homens, idade mediana 49 (39-57) anos, e 91,8% com prioridade na lista de espera. Dezenove (22,4%) usavam azatioprina, 37 (43,5%) micofenolato de mofetila, e 29 (34,1%) trocaram a terapia; a sobrevida não foi diferente entre os grupos, 2,9 (1,6-5,0) x 2,9 (1,8-4,8) x 4,2 (2,0-5,0) anos, respectivamente; p=0,4. Não houve diferença na taxa de rejeição (42%, 73% e 59% respectivamente; p=0,08) ou de RDC (T. cruzi positiva na biópsia endomiocárdica 5% x 11% x 7%; p=0,7; uso benzonidazol 58% x 65% x 69%; p=0,8; PCR positiva para T. cruzi 20% x 68% x 42% respectivamente; p=0,1). Este estudo retrospectivo com pacientes com DC e TC não mostrou diferença na sobrevida entre os diferentes regimes antiproliferativos. O uso de micofenolato de mofetila não foi associado com taxas significativamente mais altas de RDC ou rejeição do enxerto nesta coorte. Novos ensaios randomizados são necessários para abordar essa questão.

Comparative analysis of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplantation: Impact on kidney function and de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies.

PURPOSE: Blood group B kidney transplant candidates have lower transplantation rates and longer waiting times compared to other blood groups. Kidney transplantation from blood group A2-to-B has offered a solution for these patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies on kidney function and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients within the first 12 months of post-transplant. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 consecutive A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients between January 2015 and December 2022. Of these, 46 (41.8%) received Basiliximab, while 64 (58.2%) received Alemtuzumab as induction therapy. Demographics and comorbidities data were collected and compared between the two groups. Serum samples collected at 4- and 12-month intervals post-transplant were used to assess the presence of de novo DSA. Kidney allograft function was evaluated by monitoring serum creatinine levels and assessing Creatinine Clearance based on 24-h urine collection at various time points. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 20.00% of patients who received Alemtuzumab developed de novo DSA, whereas none of the patients induced with Basiliximab developed de novo DSA (p = 0.038). Recipients who received Basiliximab were older (mean age = 72.00) and received higher Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidneys (mean = 75) compared to those induced with Alemtuzumab (mean age = 58.00, mean KDPI = 49) (p < 0.001), with no significant difference observed in the last follow-up creatinine clearance or creatinine levels between the two groups (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: The use of Basiliximab as induction immunosuppression in A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients is associated with a lower incidence of de novo HLA DSA formation without significant differences in overall renal function compared to Alemtuzumab.